This lack of clarity over the precise location

This lack of clarity over the precise location of the section cut is significant as it btk inhibitor resulted in an error in the more detailed drawings that followed. It is likely that Lutyens or one of his employees used the original cross section as a basis for more detailed sections drawn through the chapels. On these more detailed drawings, which can be found in the Lutyens Memorial (Butler, 1984), a window is clearly shown at high level on either side of the room which, according to the original cross section, opens out to an external area around the dome of the chapter house. These windows can also be seen in the centre of Fig. 13. The process of constructing the digital model revealed that this window scenario shown on the detailed sections is incorrect. This is because the windows that open out onto the dome of the chapter house intersect the line of the sanctuary wall; a fact that is difficult to ascertain from the drawings alone. This intersecting wall results in half of the window being obscured (Fig. 15).
Conclusion The case study described here establishes a systematic and methodological investigation into an unbuilt work of architecture with great significance to the heritage of Liverpool as well as Lutyens׳ architectural portfolio. When a statement or observation is made regarding such designs; digital techniques provide enhanced evidence to support the extent of whether or not previous research is still reliable. For example, the relationship between the cathedral and Thiepval Memorial to the Missing of the Somme is clearly revealed using digital techniques to support the statement made previously by Summerson (1981). Again, deuterostomes shows that the role of the research is to augment and enhance understanding, rather than focusing on the resulting representations created.